Quiz

Dans un premier temps: when a French presentation plan promises too much

Repair eight mismatches between French presentation announcements and actual content, including missing sections, reversed order and overclaimed conclusions.

In short

Revise the promise or develop the missing content. Dans un premier temps cannot compensate for a section that never appears. An accurate modest plan is more useful than a grand announcement unsupported by the body.

Yellow the idea to rememberBlue French to learn

A woman looks at three framed pictures above three compartments; two compartments contain objects and the third is empty.
A promised section needs its own developed content; an attractive plan alone cannot supply the missing part. Illustration: Atelier

Draft outline: the introduction promises causes, effects and remedies. The first section identifies two causes; the second describes one effect; the conclusion declares a universal solution without evaluating remedies. The repair is to add a supported remedy discussion or narrow the announced task and conclusion.

  1. Question 1No account needed
    The speaker announces causes, effects and remedies, but only develops causes and effects. What needs repair?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    Develop or remove the promised remedies section.. A promised section needs content or a revised announcement.

  2. Question 2No account needed
    The body starts with remedies, then causes. Which plan is accurate?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    First remedies, then causes. The announcement should reflect the actual order.

  3. Question 3No account needed
    A section promises a comparison but describes only A. What is missing?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    A relevant account of B on shared criteria. Comparison needs both objects and a shared basis.

  4. Question 4No account needed
    A conclusion introduces a new unsupported cause. What is the issue?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    It exceeds the developed evidence.. The conclusion should not smuggle in an unexamined claim.

  5. Question 5No account needed
    Does dans un premier temps guarantee a developed argument?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    No. A signpost cannot replace content.

  6. Question 6No account needed
    A plan promises to prove the best solution, but evidence compares two limited trials. What is a sound repair?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    Promise a bounded comparison of the two trials.. Scale the question to the dossier.

  7. Question 7No account needed
    Can a speaker explicitly revise an announced plan?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    Yes, explain the change clearly.. An explicit adjustment can keep the audience oriented.

  8. Question 8No account needed
    What should each major section contribute?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    A developed step toward the question. Architecture serves the argument.

Order and depth are separate

A presentation can follow the announced order yet fail to develop one part. Conversely, a developed argument may need its introduction updated because revision changed the order. Ask two questions: can the listener locate each promised section, and does it do the work the title promised?

Nous examinerons d’abord les deux causes documentées, puis les effets observés ; les données ne permettent pas encore de choisir un remède général.

We will first examine the two documented causes, then the observed effects; the data do not yet allow a general remedy to be chosen.

This revised opening names the coverage and the limit. It leaves room for a future investigation without pretending that the present dossier already settles it. Keep a conclusion proportionate to the comparisons actually developed.