Dialogue
Concede a technical benefit while rejecting its ethical justification in French
Practise an eighteen-line French ethics debate that grants a measured technical benefit while challenging its sufficiency as a justification for rollout.
- C2
- 18 lines
- Practice mode
- Learn this in the C2 notebook →
In short
Grant the observed benefit and challenge the inference separately: J’accepte ce résultat ; il ne suffit pas à justifier la généralisation. Then name the additional criterion and a proportionate alternative. You need not attack the other speaker’s motives.
Yellow the idea to rememberBlue French to learn
The speakers agree that the trial reduces average delay on the studied sites. B does not retract that concession. The disagreement concerns whether speed alone justifies expansion when users cannot refuse incompatible times. The alternative keeps some benefit while testing an added choice.
- A
Le système réduit le délai moyen de deux jours.
English
The system reduces the average delay by two days.
- B
J’accepte ce résultat sur les sites suivis.
I accept that result on the sites studied.
English
I accept that result on the sites studied.
- A
Il faut donc le généraliser.
English
So it must be rolled out.
- B
Le gain technique ne suffit pas à justifier cette conclusion.
The technical gain does not suffice to justify that conclusion.
English
The technical gain does not suffice to justify that conclusion.
- A
Vous niez son utilité ?
English
Do you deny its usefulness?
- B
Non, je distingue utilité et priorité éthique.
No, I distinguish usefulness and ethical priority.
English
No, I distinguish usefulness and ethical priority.
- A
Quel autre critère proposez-vous ?
English
What other criterion do you propose?
- B
La possibilité de refuser un horaire incompatible.
The ability to refuse an incompatible time.
English
The ability to refuse an incompatible time.
- A
Cela pourrait ralentir l’attribution.
English
That could slow allocation.
- B
Je reconnais ce coût.
I acknowledge that cost.
English
I acknowledge that cost.
- A
Comment préserver une partie du bénéfice ?
English
How can some benefit be preserved?
- B
En proposant deux options plutôt qu’une seule.
By offering two options rather than one.
English
By offering two options rather than one.
- A
Le logiciel actuel ne le permet pas.
English
The current software does not allow it.
- B
Essayons une modification limitée avant toute généralisation.
Let us trial a limited modification before rollout.
English
Let us trial a limited modification before rollout.
- A
Avec quels indicateurs ?
English
With which indicators?
- B
Le délai et les refus d’horaire, suivis séparément.
Waiting time and rejected time slots, tracked separately.
English
Waiting time and rejected time slots, tracked separately.
- A
Nous partageons donc le constat, mais pas encore la décision.
English
So we share the finding, but not yet the decision.
- B
Oui, c’est la distinction que je souhaite maintenir.
Yes, that is the distinction I want to retain.
English
Yes, that is the distinction I want to retain.
Refute the inference, not the finding
A benefit can be genuine yet insufficient for a decision. B therefore names both the accepted result and the unmet criterion. The final exchange records shared facts without fabricating shared approval. The proposed separate indicators also prevent the next trial from collapsing speed and choice into one unexplained score.
Rehearse the reply with another criterion. Keep the concession in one complete clause, then state what more the decision requires. This makes the logical disagreement clear without weakening the accepted evidence.