Matching game
DELF B2 argument defence: match evidence to the exact challenge
Match French argument-defence replies to precise cost, fairness, feasibility and evidence objections. Use full exchanges rather than merely related facts.
- B2
- 5 pairs
- Tap to match
- Learn this in the B2 notebook →
In short
Identify what the objection asks you to establish. A cost challenge needs a funding answer; a fairness challenge needs an access answer; a feasibility challenge needs an implementation answer. A true fact can still fail to answer the question.
Yellow the idea to rememberBlue French to learn

You defend a three-month evening-opening trial. The audience raises five different concerns. A reply about popularity cannot by itself answer who will staff the reception desk. The matching task keeps each concern tied to the evidence or arrangement that addresses it.
Tap one on the left, then its partner on the right.
Correct an overstatement before defending the recommendation
The evidence objection identifies an unsupported universal claim. The useful reply corrects it to a respondent count. That correction need not destroy the trial proposal; it can change the reason for it. A bounded trial may be justified as a way to learn about use rather than as implementation of a unanimous demand.
Vous soulevez une question de personnel. La fréquentation attendue ne suffit pas à y répondre ; voici l’organisation proposée.
You raise a staffing question. Expected attendance is not enough to answer it; here is the proposed organisation.
For your own defence, use a short bridge: sur le coût…, quant à l’accès…, pour la mise en œuvre…. Then give the matching answer and return to your proposal. This makes the exchange responsive rather than a memorised speech repeated over every question.