AtelierLe journal · French, understood
English

Language

The course

Updated

Quiz

Fermeté or intransigeance: French evaluation hidden in a noun

Edited by Chris Lee · Updated · About the library

Practise French evaluative noun pairs such as fermeté and intransigeance through ten focused questions, separating a writer’s judgement from the underlying facts.

In short

A noun can evaluate while naming an action. Fermeté commonly presents resistance favourably; intransigeance commonly criticises it as excessive. The exercises state the writer’s intention so you can identify the framing without pretending the word proves the facts.

Yellow the idea to rememberBlue French to learn

A hand holds a blank card beside another blank card hanging from a thread.
A choice of evaluative noun frames the action from the writer’s standpoint. Illustration: Atelier

Two accounts may describe a refusal to change a decision and choose different evaluative nouns. That does not mean every instance of firmness and intransigence is factually identical. The context may also contain different reasons, consequences or thresholds. First identify the described act, then the writer’s judgement, then the evidence offered for that judgement.

Favourable framingAdverse framingShared question
fermetéintransigeanceIs resistance justified or excessive?
prudencefrilositéIs delay careful or unnecessarily fearful?
constanceentêtementIs persistence principled or unreasonable?
franchisebrutalitéIs directness honest or needlessly hurtful?
  1. Question 1No account needed
    L’auteur approuve le refus d’abandonner une règle de sécurité. Quel nom correspond à son jugement ?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    fermeté. Fermeté presents the resistance favourably in this stated intention.

  2. Question 2No account needed
    L’autrice condamne le refus d’examiner une exception justifiée. Quel nom choisit-elle ?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    intransigeance. Intransigeance marks the refusal as excessive.

  3. Question 3No account needed
    L’auteur approuve la décision d’attendre des chiffres fiables. Quel nom convient ?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    prudence. Prudence praises careful judgement.

  4. Question 4No account needed
    L’autrice critique une hésitation malgré des preuves solides et un faible risque. Quel nom convient ?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    frilosité. Frilosité gives the hesitation an adverse evaluation.

  5. Question 5No account needed
    L’auteur loue le maintien d’un principe défendable au fil du temps. Quel nom choisit-il ?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    constance. Constance frames continuity favourably.

  6. Question 6No account needed
    L’autrice condamne une obstination après la réfutation de la prémisse. Quel nom convient ?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    entêtement. Entêtement marks persistence as unreasonable.

  7. Question 7No account needed
    L’auteur apprécie une réponse honnête et respectueuse. Quel nom convient ?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    franchise. Franchise values directness in this context.

  8. Question 8No account needed
    L’autrice condamne des propos qui humilient inutilement. Quel nom choisit-elle ?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    brutalité. Brutalité criticises harmful directness.

  9. Question 9No account needed
    Does the word intransigeance alone prove the refusal was objectively wrong?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    No. It gives the writer’s framing; the facts still need assessment.

  10. Question 10No account needed
    Which paraphrase preserves both fact and evaluation?

    Choose one answer.

    Answer and explanation

    The writer criticises the refusal as intransigence.. Attributing the judgement avoids adopting it silently.

The answer in each selection follows the explicitly stated intention. It is not an instruction always to praise resistance, delay or persistence. In a real article, quote the selected noun and explain the evaluation it encourages. Then distinguish that linguistic observation from your own assessment of whether the decision deserves the label.

L’éditorial présente le refus comme de l’intransigeance, sans examiner l’exception proposée.

The editorial frames the refusal as intransigence without examining the proposed exception.

This sentence attributes a judgement and identifies a possible evidential omission. It neither erases the writer’s stance nor adopts it as an established fact. That distinction is especially useful when comparing two sources whose disagreement partly concerns what counts as a reasonable limit.

Keep going