Answer a B1 French objection: adapt a museum proposal

Work through two objections to an evening museum visit. Learn when to keep a limited proposal, when to change it and how to explain the difference.

B1Practical guide4 min readIn the B1 notebook →

In short

First name what the objection challenges: the benefit, the evidence or a condition of your proposal. Accept the valid point, then explain what follows for your plan. A limited benefit can still support a trial; a missing essential condition can mean changing the plan.

Yellow the idea to rememberBlue French to learn

Visitors explore a small museum gallery in the evening.
Discuss whether une visite en soirée could work. Illustration: Atelier

Je serais favorable à une visite en soirée à titre d’essai, si l’équipe pouvait l’organiser. Certaines personnes ne peuvent pas venir l’après-midi. Cet horaire leur donnerait une autre possibilité.

I would support a trial evening visit if the team could organise it. Some people cannot come in the afternoon. This time would give them another option.

Your position has two parts: a possible benefit for some people and a condition about organisation.

Explore the museum before discussing the visit

A small museum interior seen in a clear cutaway view at dusk, with an entrance on the left, a reception desk, one gallery with paintings, a central bench, a sta

How do you answer an objection in a DELF B1 speaking exam?

Reconnaître une limite
  1. Partenaire

    Même le soir, certaines personnes ne pourront pas venir. Votre proposition ne règle donc pas tout.

    Even in the evening, some people won’t be able to come. So your proposal doesn’t solve everything.

  2. You

    C’est vrai, cet horaire ne conviendra pas à tout le monde. Il pourrait toutefois aider certaines personnes qui travaillent l’après-midi. On pourrait faire un essai, puis demander aux participants si l’horaire leur convient.

    That’s true: this time won’t suit everyone. It could, however, help some people who work in the afternoon. We could run a trial, then ask participants whether the time suits them.

What the reply does
MoveWords to noticeEffect
Accept a limitC’est vraiRecognises that some people still cannot attend.
Keep the narrower benefitIl pourrait toutefois aider certaines personnesKeeps the claim about some people.
Suggest a checkOn pourrait faire un essaiProposes a trial and feedback; results will come later.

Objection 2: nobody can staff reception

Changer la proposition
  1. Partenaire

    Personne dans l’équipe n’est disponible pour accueillir les visiteurs le soir.

    Nobody on the team is available to welcome visitors in the evening.

  2. You

    Dans ce cas, il faut revoir le projet. Je proposais un essai si l’équipe pouvait l’organiser. Cherchons un autre créneau avec elle.

    In that case, we need to rethink the project. I was suggesting a trial if the team could organise it. Let’s look for another time slot with them.

The first objection narrows the benefit; the second removes the staffing condition. Your reply changes because the new information changes a different part of the proposal. Point to that connection when you review your answer.

Before answering the objection

A self-review aid, not a grade. Ticks are not saved.

Question 1No account needed
“Some people still cannot come.” Which part of the proposal is challenged?

Choose one answer.

Answer and explanation

How many people the proposed time could help.. The objection concerns who can benefit from the proposed time.

Question 2No account needed
Nobody can staff reception. Which reply addresses that new fact?

Choose one answer.

Answer and explanation

Dans ce cas, cherchons un autre créneau.. Looking for another slot responds to the missing staffing condition.

Question 3No account needed
What does on pourrait demander aux participants describe?

Choose one answer.

Answer and explanation

A proposed way to check whether the trial helps.. The conditional introduces a possible next action, before any feedback has been gathered.