Dialogue

Respond to a critical review in French: an editor–author exchange

Practise French replies to editorial criticism. Match each comment to a visible revision, explain a retained choice and distinguish completed edits from plans.

In short

Name the reviewer’s concern, point to the change and explain what it fixes. Nous avons ajouté… au deuxième paragraphe reports an edit the reader can find. Use nous ajouterons for a change still planned.

Yellow the idea to rememberBlue French to learn

An author and editor discussing a revised plain manuscript at a calm shared table.
A revision gives substance to nous avons ajouté. Illustration: Atelier
The material the author is revising
ItemText
Option AUne équipe assure l’accueil chaque jour de 14 h à 18 h.
Option BLes créneaux d’accueil varient et sont annoncés la veille.
Reviewer’s commentVotre comparaison présente les deux options, mais le critère du choix reste implicite.
Original conclusionNous recommandons l’option A.
Revised second paragraphNotre priorité est la continuité de l’accueil. L’option A prévoit des horaires fixes chaque jour, tandis que les créneaux de l’option B varient. Nous retenons donc l’option A pour cette régularité.
CostsLe dossier ne contient aucune donnée sur les coûts.

The author has added the criterion and connected it to the timetable difference. Read the exchange, then switch to practice mode and draft each author reply from its English cue. Keep the replies tied to the revised paragraph above.

Your lines are hidden in practice mode. Say them aloud, then reveal to compare.
  1. Relectrice

    Votre comparaison présente les deux options, mais le critère du choix reste implicite.

    English

    Your comparison presents both options, but the criterion for choosing remains implicit.

  2. Auteur

    Vous soulignez le manque de lien entre la comparaison et la recommandation. Nous avons explicité ce lien au deuxième paragraphe.

    Restate the missing link and say where you made it explicit.

    English

    You point out the missing link between the comparison and the recommendation. We have made this link explicit in the second paragraph.

  3. Relectrice

    Quel critère avez-vous retenu ?

    English

    Which criterion did you choose?

  4. Auteur

    La continuité de l’accueil. Le paragraphe précise désormais que les horaires fixes de l’option A répondent à cette priorité.

    Name continuity of reception and connect it to option A’s fixed hours.

    English

    Continuity of reception. The paragraph now explains that option A’s fixed hours meet this priority.

  5. Relectrice

    Ne pourriez-vous pas fusionner les deux options dans la présentation ?

    English

    Could you merge the two options in the presentation?

  6. Auteur

    Nous conservons deux options distinctes, car leurs horaires d’accueil diffèrent. Cette différence est précisément ce qui motive notre choix.

    Retain the distinction and explain why it matters to your choice.

    English

    We are keeping two distinct options because their reception hours differ. That difference is precisely what motivates our choice.

  7. Relectrice

    Pouvez-vous aussi comparer leurs coûts ?

    English

    Can you also compare their costs?

  8. Auteur

    Le dossier ne contient pas de données sur les coûts. Nous ajouterons une phrase pour préciser que notre comparaison porte sur les horaires.

    State the cost-data gap, then announce the scope sentence you will add.

    English

    The dossier contains no cost data. We will add a sentence to explain that our comparison concerns the timetables.

How do you respond to a critical review in French?

Merci pour votre remarque sur le critère de choix. Nous avons précisé, au deuxième paragraphe, que la continuité de l’accueil constitue notre priorité. Nous y expliquons désormais pourquoi les horaires fixes de l’option A répondent à ce critère.

Thank you for your comment on the selection criterion. In the second paragraph, we have clarified that continuity of reception is our priority. We now explain there why option A’s fixed hours meet that criterion.

This paragraph accounts for the completed edit shown above. The proposed sentence on the comparison’s scope remains a separate next edit.

Keep the status of the edit visible
StatusFrench frame
Completed additionNous avons ajouté…
Completed clarificationNous avons précisé…
Choice retainedNous conservons… car…
Planned additionNous ajouterons…
Question 1No account needed
What did the first comment ask the author to clarify?

Choose one answer.

Answer and explanation

The reason for choosing option A. The concern is the missing criterion connecting the comparison with the choice.

Question 2No account needed
Which planned change is still pending at the end of the exchange?

Choose one answer.

Answer and explanation

Adding a sentence limiting the comparison to timetables. The author uses nous ajouterons for the scope sentence. It is a future edit.

Question 3No account needed
Which reply gives a reason for retaining two options?

Choose one answer.

Answer and explanation

Nous les conservons, car leurs horaires d’accueil diffèrent.. The timetable difference is visible in the material and is relevant to the recommendation.